Thousands of young and some not
so young people have assembled at Jantar Mantar protesting against caste-based
reservations in institutions of higher learning and all employments under
state. Media coverage has been fairly muted. But police oppression has been far more violent and brutal than what was witnessed during Cockroach Janata Party led agitation. There are clips on social media platforms showing pro-reservation groups violently attacking peaceful protestors, and particularly targeting young women, right under the nose of police. Unfortunately, some cops also appear to be unleashing violence and intimidating protestors in total violation of law of the land.
Protestors contend that they are facing brazen discrimination in a free society on basis of their identity; Despite doing significantly better on parameters of merit, their comparative access to opportunities far higher learning and employment with state has been curtailed. Whereas a small minority of richer members of SC, ST and Other Backward Communities, who collectively constitute nearly 75 percent of total population of the country are getting overly preferential treatment ignoring merit, skill and even threshold level of efficiency in institutions.
They maintain that issue is not about employment and education lone. The entire process is undermining spirit of democracy, national cohesion and our aspiration for optimal and comprehensive advancement as a nation. Such open caste politics has eliminated space for political accountability and efficiency in governance. Even corruption appears justifiable on account of caste and identity politics. The entire issue has deepened caste divide that in return appears to have substantially hollowed out our democracy, where people no longer identify with each other as citizens. This is making a mockery of rule of law, free and fair competition as well as natural rights of all citizens as enshrined in the constitution.
Reservation is a highly emotive issue that has polarised society to such an extent that a solution shall be extremely difficult for the same. Beneficiaries of reservation allege systemic discrimination of their forefathers over centuries. There is enough substance in the same. Members of Dalit community have faced brazen discrimination until recently. But evidences suggest that these may have originated largely during medieval era when India itself was under foreign rule. The poorest among the local population were more oppressed than the rest. The remedial measures in form of reservation did help improve plight of Dalits in many pockets of the country. Yet poorest of the poor, continue to face indignity and humiliation irrespective of their identity.
But sustained political mobilisation in name of caste, over the last several decades, has vitiated entire social environment to an extent that emotional and psychological cohesion of India as a state and society has come under threat. I recall exchanging few words with an illustrious former civil servant turned former parliamentarian and former Minister a few months back. He cautioned me that even word against reservation could invite such mob lynching that one's corpse would be found only in some deep gutter and hence no sensible person should ever attempt it.
Numerical arithmetic of caste politics is such that no political party could afford to oppose caste-based reservations. Simultaneously, there has been large-scale articulation of hate on social media against financially poorer members of so-called socially higher castes. Some of the majoritarian caste groups have threatened to expel and enslave section of so-called higher caste, violate their women and frame them up in fake cases as they controlled the systems now. They charge members of Brahmins, Thakurs and Vaishyas of denying rightful opportunities to majority of Indians. Such hate helps mobilise significant sections of Hindu population and entire Muslim population who otherwise account for over 90% of Indias against 10 percent of Savarna population.
National Cohesion, Equal Opportunity and Fairness
Nationalist and patriotic forces
who advocate national cohesion and rule of law, maintain that true issue is
erosion of national cohesion and denial of equitable access to opportunities.
These are crushing of the spirit of genuine competition that fosters excellence. The percetpion is gaining ground that the current system is breeding entitlement, obfuscating governance, legitimising
corruption, and perpetuating societal fissure. All of these seriously threaten
our long-term security and optimal progress as a state and civilisation. Indiscriminate
and sustained use of reservations no longer remains a ladder to uplift the
disadvantaged. It has rather become a fortress for vested interests, possibly
pursuing geopolitical agenda of global deep states seeking to crush optimal progress of
India. They need not wage a war for this. By foisting mediocrity and entitlements at cost of excellence, innovation
and integrity, they shall be able to choke optimal progress of India.
Genesis of Reservation: From Interim measure in 1950 to Mandal Commission:
Reservations were brought in Indian
constitution, initially for 15 years only as an interim measure to ensure
representation for most impoverished and deprived castes as well as certain
tribes in govt services and institutions of higher learning only as an interim
measure. Simultaneously, it was expected that with rule of law, universal
access to quality education and creation of dignified employment opportunities
for all, the need for reservations shall end. However, reverse happened. Successive
regimes found reservation as a convenient tool for political mobilisation. No
one dared ending reservation in 1965 and it has been successively extended. In
fact hundreds of newer communities have been added in the list of Scheduled
caste and Scheduled Tribe with suspected agenda of expanding support base.
Amidst all these, Mandal Commission recommendations were implemented sometime in 1990. The background of its implementation was interesting. Vishwanath Pratap Singh, the then Prime Minister who had formed a government following 1989 polls suddenly found himself in precarious position following withdrawal of support by his associate Chaudhary Devi Lal, a political strong man from Haryana. It is believed that it was out of panic that Singh implemented these recommendations that were lying cold storage. His objective was to surge mass support in his favour by stoking caste identity. He did it at a time when sections of Indians were talking about implementation of Directive Principles of State Policy, which envisioned building a fairer, just and an achievement-oriented society.
Implementation of Mandal Commission recommendations in 1990 had triggered violent protests, including suicides among students. A large
number of youth and leaders from even OBC communities had voiced their
apprehension that the move would deeply fracture in India’s social fabric and
national cohesion.
Since then reservation has appeared less about empowerment of
communities and more about political arithmetic that has allowed successive
regimes evade accountability on governance performance and hide behind caste
arithmetic and oppress anyone who questioned them. It was remarkable that in
2014, BJP was able to bridge caste divide to a substantial extent by securing
landslide victory in name of Hindu unity. This was the era when UPA regime
appeared too meek to resist sustained Islamic terror attacks and was overly
placating Muslim hardline groups by going soft on Islamic terrorism.
The Enormity of the Problem
The issue of reservation appears to have assumed monstrous proposition since then. There have been instances where people with minus or big negative
markings have secured seats in specialist branches of medical and engineering colleges
whereas those with much higher positive marks have missed out. This is being cited as
day light murder of merit, which is impacting comprehensive performance of the
nation and bringing down standards in every sphere. India’s premier medical and engineering institutions, such as AIIMS and IITs, have witnessed repeated controversies
where merit seats shrink and reserved seats expand disproportionately. The net
consequence is serious decline in institutional excellence. When doctors,
engineers and scientists are recruited not over competence but over caste, the sanctity
of healthcare delivery to national infrastructure and scientific progress of
the nation appear compromised or sub-optimal.
Similar is the plight of civil service. Leadership level
roles in bureaucracy are not meant for employment generation. These are expected to
provide high quality regulatory and enforcement services to drive excellence in
overall governance and national productivity. But the steel frame of state is being held
hostage to caste identities. Officers are recruited and promoted not on
performance but on entitlements. Corruption is justified in the name of caste
loyalty. Rich elites within backward communities ensure their dominance by
keeping their own communities poor, thereby perpetuating dependency and
resentment.
Corruption, nepotism, and rent‑collection are rationalised
are more often, in private,in name of empowerment of backward
and oppressed communities and their right to help out their own community. The rule
of law has been turning increasingly unsustainable amidst rising levels of
corruption and caste loyalty. Individuals even within the backward and
scheduled communities lack motivation and urge to optimise their potential and
excel to the best of their capacity. The net outcome is institutionalisation of
mediocrity and total cap on innovation. This is what explains an entire
ecosystem, characterised by corruption, entitlement and reservation, where
Indians living inside India are rarely known for excellence and innovation whereas
same Indians do so very well once they migrate to advanced economies and
societies, governed by higher quality of rule of law and meritocracy.
Elites from SC/ST and OBC communities have become
disproportionately powerful in politics and business. Even Prime Minister of
India has repeatedly claimed that he belongs to one of the most "backward" communities. This is a clear indicator that definition and meaning of backward
has nothing to do with deprivation. Wealthy members of these communities, otherwise
monopolise benefits, while the genuinely poor remain excluded. This entrenches
inequality within communities and perpetuates resentment across society.
Indians, especially their elite, need to extricate themselves from self-seeking petty parochialism and mutual hate towards each other. There are many case studies by eminent sociologists like M N Srinivas, Yogendra Singh, Ghurye, Andre Beteille etc who have demonstrated that castes or Varnas were never closed groups. Even royalties, after defeat in wars were condemned to status of outcastes or Dalits whereas leather workers became Brahmins and tribals and Shudras became Kshatriyas and royalty. The word Dasa and Dasyu has been intermittently used in Vedic texts appears more in context of tamed communities who might have been violent and aggressive otherwise and robbing or attacking the dominant tribes.
Contrary to Islamist historians seeking to project that
India also practiced organised slavery, Kautilyan work or for that matter its
predecessors like Parashara, Bharadvaja, Vaisalksha, Vatavyadhi, Pisuna etc
have never mentioned about organised slavery. One of the primary reasons that ancient
India lacked impressive monuments like palaces of Kings or private tomb of
royals and elite was absence of organised slavery. All mega structures all over
the world – varying from Egypt, Rome, West Asia and China etc had been built by
slave labour. Whole of West continued to trade in slave labour until the end of
19th Century. Even Oxford and Cambridge history of India written in
19th Century by the Western experts have maintained children from same family
were assigned different castes depending upon their aptitude and ability. It is
unfortunate that in course of time these divisions became hereditary.
Things could never have been ideal in an externally
subjugated prosperous society. Hereditary entitlement in name of caste may have
played a prominent role in decay and degeneration of India. It is time that
Indians realised this and came out of this trap to appreciate their real
governance challenges and priorities.
Meritocracy Alone Sustains Excellence
A vibrant society thrives on meritocracy and fair competition.
Entitlement driven politics or bureaucracy or political mobilisation in name of
caste robs democracy and patriotism of
its soul. Instead of uniting citizens under a common identity, caste and
entitlement fractures society and kills excellence.
We have seen how societies like Singapore have risen from
poverty to prosperity by institutionalising meritocracy and not seeking refuge
in entitlements. Competence, innovation, and integrity sustain all round
excellence of that island nation. Similarly, South Korea’s investment in
universal education and competition transformed it into a technological
powerhouse. Norway or model democracies of Scandinavia have institutionalised
fairness and equal opportunity in all dimensions of life to outperform giant
states on parameters of public infrastructure and efficiency of governance
institutions. Even China’s sustained surge is driven by exceptional level of
meritocracy and performance driven specialist leadership in civil service.
India has enormous potential and strengths. Reservations is not the sole form
of entitlement but it would be seen that the biggest votaries of reservations
are all entitlement driven dynasts in Indian politics and the rest have also
fallen in the trap. On the other hand, we have allowed entitlements and caste
politics to crush our comprehensive potential and national cohesion.
India needs to restructure its bureaucracy, the enforcement arm of
state to ensure:
1. Universal Access to Quality Education : investments in
schools, universities, and vocational training can enhance productive
capacities of our entire population. Instead of raising competition for few
super rewarding jobs, every job should offer a degree of dignity and reasonable
level of economic security.
2. Creation of a culture of genuine leadership
at district level: Instead of current
collector Raj, I have recommended creation of capable people’s representatives
and experienced and mature CEOs from bureaucracy. They must plan and build capacities
in collaboration with all concerned within the state and central govts to ensure gainful
employability of entire population. Details in this direction are available in
my interviews and other papers.
3. Universities, civil services, judiciary and defence forces are strictly kept away from caste politics: These must induct and reward incumbents on basis of performance and excellence.
We are living in a highly competitive world. We must appreciate that any fissiparous or divisive measure that fractures our national cohesion and leads to sub-optimal performance on governance parameters threatens not merely national cohesion but also our long-term security as a nation.Reservation was conceived as an interim corrective. It has long outlived its utility. Its time we transcended from caste divide to national cohesion. Perpetuation of every form of entitlement threatens our national cohesion and national power. We must move towards creating fair and equitable opportunities for all and harness the same for optimising our collective strength as a nation. Liberation from caste and religious divide is a precondition for this purpose.
******************************************
No comments:
Post a Comment