India-US Tariff Truce: Need to Transform Short-Term Tactical Gains In to Long-Term Strategic Strengths

                        Despite my academic degree in Economic diplomacy, as a practitioner, I specialized in diplomacy,                                                security. Yet my interest in grand strategy in national security, pushes me to examine this issue at this juncture.                             I have been assisted by a young associate in getting some data and preparation of the table as well as some                               draft notes. He has chosen not to be acknowledged. However, the perspective and conclusions are entirely                                   mine. I regret if any data or table from the web has crept into this piece that deserves to acknowledged. 

                                                                            SECTION: A

A Broad Outline

    Indian Sensex has experienced strong gains following President Trump's announcement of substantial roll back of US tariffs on Indian imports. The joy and jubilation has been particular evident in the labour intensive sectors like textiles/apparels, gems and jewelry and marine exports etc that account for nearly half the value of approximately 90-billion dollar Indian exports to US. 

    Modi-Trump deal is unquestionably a major short-term relief for Indian economy. Indian equities saw a strong positive reaction right after the announcement, with indices rallying and the rupee strengthening on expectations of improved trade and investor confidence.  The gains may not be restricted to export earnings alone. It rather signals a renewed strategic engagement that carries a potential for deeper partnership with US, notwithstanding the unpredictability of President Trump and his tactical approach. Amid broader geopolitical uncertainties, this appears a silverlining. Nevertheless, concerns about supply chain resilience, energy security, and India's relationships with Russia and China shall continue to persist. 

    Many specifics and final text of the agreement— including exact timelines for tariff eliminations on both sides, sector-by-sector commitments, and legal enforcement mechanisms — are yet available publicly. But whatever little that has come out demonstrates need for leveraging short term gains to create long-term strategic advantages. 

As part of the deal, India has apparently pledged to raise US exports to India nearly 500 billion US dollars by bringing down tariff and non-tariff barriers to zero level for a wide variety of imports. However, the time frame to achieve this goal is still uncertain. And so is the total list of sectors  that shall be allowed such zero-tariff market access.   

The Deal: 

The United States has: 

• reduced reciprocal tariffs on Indian goods — from 25 % to 18 % with immediate effect. 
• has withdrawn additional punitive tariffs (up to another ~25 %) linked with India’s purchase of Russian oil.

In return, India has offered to:   

• reduce tariffs and non-tariff barriers on U.S. goods to zero tariffs for many categories; 
• raise imports from the United States across a wide spectrum - including energy (oil & gas), technology, agriculture, defense equipment, aircraft, and others— to a volume of $500 billion over the next few years; and 
• halt reduce purchases of Russian oil.

                                                            SECTION: B

A SECTOR WISE ASSESSMENT OF IMPACT OF THE DEAL:

 Textiles & Apparel

Impact: Strong positive

• Textiles and apparel are among India’s most export-exposed sectors to the U.S., with roughly a quarter or more of shipments going there. 
• The tariff reduction improves price competitiveness compared with rivals like Bangladesh and Vietnam, potentially unlocking new orders. 

Winners:

• Garment manufacturers
• Home textile producers
• Yarn and fibre exporters

Risks:

• Benefits depend on global demand; margins could still be squeezed by input costs.
• Lead times for new orders and supply chain adjustments may delay impact.

---

Gems & Jewellery:

Impact: Positive

• This is another labour-intensive export category hit hard by past high tariffs; the cut to 18% helps reduce landed cost for U.S. importers. 
• India accounts for a meaningful share of U.S. polished diamond and jewellery imports, so demand may stabilize or recover. 

Winners:

• Diamond polishing and gold jewellery exporters

Risks:

• Global luxury demand is cyclical, so recovery may be uneven.

---

Engineering Goods & Auto Components

Impact: Moderate to Positive

• Engineering goods (including industrial machinery, electrical equipment, and auto parts) benefit from lower tariffs, improving pricing against competitors. 
• Auto components tied into global supply chains could see renewed contracts. 

Winners:

• Exporters integrated with international OEMs
• Precision engineering and capital goods suppliers

Risks:

• Passenger vehicle exports may benefit less if mass-market tariffs or regulatory barriers remain; the most significant gains are for components and specialized machinery rather than complete cars. 

---

Agriculture & Food Exports

Impact: Mixed and Still Unclear

• U.S. analysts expect expanded American farm exports to India, which could help narrow U.S. agricultural trade deficits. 
• India’s concessions — particularly in dairy or genetically modified crops — remain politically sensitive and not fully detailed. 

Potential Winners:

• Marine products like shrimp
• Rice exporters (possible tariff relief)

Risks:

• Domestic farmers worry about competition from highly subsidised U.S. farm products who enjoy huge advantage on account of their much larger scale and volume of production.
• Final agricultural terms are not yet fully public; potential exposure may grow once detailed.

---

Chemicals & Specialty Inputs

Impact: Positive Long-Term

• Specialty chemicals and intermediates can gain pricing advantage and deeper access to U.S. supply chains. 
• Many foreign companies are diversifying supply chains away from China — a “China-plus-one” trend that could benefit India’s chemical exporters.

Winners:

• Specialty chemical makers
• Suppliers in diversified global value chains

Risks:

• These are contractual, long-term markets — gains are gradual rather than instantaneous.

---

Seafood & Marine Products

Impact: Positive

• Reduced duty pressure is expected to help restore U.S. market demand following tariff-related slowdowns. 

Winners:

• Shrimp exporters (U.S. accounts for a large share of volumes)
• Frozen seafood sectors

Risks:

• Logistical costs and quality compliance matter more than tariffs in this segment.

---

IT Services & Pharmaceuticals

Impact: Indirect / Neutral to Positive
These sectors are largely services-based and not directly affected by goods tariffs, but improved bilateral trade relations and sentiment could help:

Potential Gains:

• Better business environment for service exports into the U.S.
• Stronger investment and bilateral tech cooperation

Risks:

• Sector impacts derive more from macro sentiment and diplomatic ties than direct tariff changes.

---

Financial Markets & Investment Flows

Market Reaction:

• Indian markets rallied sharply on the deal, with indices jumping and the rupee strengthening — reflecting improved investor confidence. 

Sector Gains:

• Export-linked equities
• Banks and financials (via balance sheet improvement and credit demand)

Risks:

• Sentiment-driven rallies can fade if implementation lags.

---

Key Risks & Practical Challenges

Implementation Details Uncertain: Many tariff schedules, timelines, and regulatory terms are still being finalized. 
Agriculture Sensitivity: Farm sector access remains an unresolved flashpoint. 
Energy Shift Costs: If India reduces Russian oil imports significantly — as claimed — refining economics and fuel costs could be affected. 
Global Competitive Dynamics: Lower U.S. tariffs improve competitiveness but don’t guarantee immediate volume growth — order books and supply chain readiness matter. 

---

A Chart Depicting Sector Winners & Risks

Sector	Expected Impact	Notes
Textiles & Apparel	Significant	Lower duties improve price competitiveness
Gems & Jewellery	Strong	Higher U.S. demand prospects
Engineering & Auto Components	Moderate	Best for components vs full vehicles
Chemicals & Speciality Inputs	Long-term gain	Global supply chain shift helps
Seafood & Marine	Positive	Tariff relief boosts demand
Agriculture	Mixed	Sensitive domestic politics, details pending
IT / Pharma	Neutral to positive	Indirect benefits from sentiment
Financial Markets	Positive	Rally on improved outlook

---

Overall Assessment: 

The sectoral impact of the trade deal is largely positive but the fine print matters — especially on agricultural access, services rules, energy sourcing obligations, and tariff phase-ins — which will shape the real-world effects over the coming 12–24 months. 

---

                                                         SECTION-C

A Comparative Position Vis-a-Vis China, Vietnam and Bangladesh: 

Significance of reduction in tariffs lays in its ability to bolster relative competitiveness of Indian goods in the U.S. market compared to major rivals. I have taken the following three case studies  

• China (systemic rival, high tariffs, tech controls),
• Vietnam (preferred China-plus-one hub),
• Bangladesh (low-cost apparel powerhouse).

---

Comparative Matrix: India vs China vs Vietnam vs Bangladesh (Post-Deal)

Dimension	India	China	Vietnam	Bangladesh
U.S. Tariff Regime (Goods)	Reduced to ~18% average; punitive layers removed	High and sticky; Section 301 tariffs largely intact	Lower, stable MFN-type access	Low tariffs for apparel
Political Risk in U.S. Perception	Low–moderate (strategic partner)	High (systemic rival)	Low	Low
Supply-Chain Trust (U.S. firms)	Improving	Declining	High	Moderate
Labour-Intensive Manufacturing	Strong but uneven	Very strong (but politically risky)	Strong and organised	Very strong (narrow base)
Scale & Market Depth	Very large	Massive	Medium	Narrow
Value-Added Capability	Medium–high	High	Medium	Low
Energy & Strategic Alignment with U.S.	Increasing	Adversarial	Neutral-positive	Neutral
Non-Tariff Barriers (India’s own)	Still significant	Moderate	Low	Low

---

Sector-by-Sector Competitive Re-Ranking

Textiles & Apparel

Before deal

• Bangladesh + Vietnam beat India on landed cost.
• India lost orders despite scale.

After deal

• India closes much of the tariff gap.
• India becomes competitive in:
• Home textiles,
• Mid-value garments,
• Large-volume diversified orders.

Still weaker than Bangladesh in:

• Ultra-low-cost basic apparel.

Bottom line: India moves from “expensive alternative” to “reliable scale player”.

---

Gems & Jewellery

• China already marginal here.
• Vietnam and Bangladesh are not real competitors.

Post-deal effect

• India consolidates dominance in:
• Polished diamonds,
• Gold jewellery for U.S. retail chains.

Bottom line:  India gain as tariffs were the main friction.

---

Engineering Goods & Auto Components

China

• Technologically strong but politically constrained.
• Facing sourcing diversification pressure.

Vietnam

• Good assembly base, limited depth.

India (post-deal)

• Becomes more attractive for:
• Tier-2 and Tier-3 auto components,
• Industrial machinery,
• Electrical equipment.

Bottom line: India gains marginally and can emerge a credible option.

---

Chemicals & Specialty Inputs

• U.S. seeking to reduce their dependence on China may find India a credible alternative.

Following can act to advantages of India to a limited extent: 

• Tariff relief,
• Regulatory comfort,
• IP protection credibility.

Risk: Given China's strategic psyche, any major advantage for India in any sector may invite indirect wrath and retaliation as well, nullifying gains.

Vietnam/Bangladesh

• Limited chemical ecosystem.

Bottom line:
India emerges as the preferred non-China supplier in specialty chemicals. But the scale and volume of gains may remain limited.  

---

Agriculture & Food Products

In this sector India stands to lose far more by giving zero tariff market access to highly subsidized large scale agricultural producers of the USA.

• Bangladesh, Vietnam: limited agri competition.
• U.S. pressure is inward — opening India’s market.

Bottom line: India gains little but seriously risks its food security and the matter has already ignited a ruckus discourse.

---

Strategic Interpretation: What the Deal Actually Does?

India is Being Coopted in the U.S. Trade Strategy As A Trusted Associate or Desirable Adjunct?

This is something that China neither enjoys, and probably nor desires; Vietnam cannot fully offer the size and scale of market.

However, the net gains for India may be negative in the long-run if it does not reset not only the fine prints of the deal but also its own internal structural and institutional gaps.

---

Why Vietnam Still Matters (and Why India Isn’t Replacing It)

Vietnam remains superior for:

• Fast execution,
• Plug-and-play manufacturing,
• Lower bureaucratic friction.

But Vietnam lacks:

• Market size,
• Domestic demand,
• Strategic heft.

India may at best emerge as the additional pillar of US Trade and Economic Strategy in Asia if it plays ball but it appears unlikely to replace Vietnam in near future.

---

Bangladesh likely to Be Boxed In But Not Replaced

Bangladesh will retain:

• Dominant market access to basic garment sector;

Whereas India may gain easier access to:

• Diversified, higher-value, compliance-heavy segments.

Net Result: clear segmentation and no replacement or displacement of Bangladesh by India.

---

What Must India Fix to Optimize gains from the Deal

Even after tariff relief, India loses orders due to:

1. Non-tariff frictions
• Customs delays,
• Compliance unpredictability.
2. Logistics costs
• Still higher than Vietnam.
3. Policy credibility
• Exporters fear sudden rule changes.

Without these, tariff reduction shall under-deliver.

---

Strategic Conclusion:

Compared to China:

India may appear more trustworthy for the US but China remains way too efficient in advanced manufacturing.  Given the strategic psyche of China and governance gaps and institutional fragility in India, China may do everything possible to sabotage close US-India partnership in any sphere that threatens its interests and agenda in the region. 

Compared to Vietnam:

India has advantage in terms of scale and geopolitical heft but Vietnam remains operationally smoother and yet may invite lesser Chinese wrath or covert sabotage as it does not pose any threat to Chinese dominance of the region;

Compared to Bangladesh:

India is more diversified and resilient but Bangladesh is competitive for cheaper end of goods;

---

Bottom Line: Trump–Modi deal does not make India the cheapest supplier or the biggest beneficiary but its certainly makes India a relatively more competitive alternative.

Hence the deal appears a tactical respite or reprieve and not even a tactical win; It needs to be leveraged as an opportunity for strategic upgrade in all spheres. 

---

                                                    SECTION: D

Trump–Modi Deal: What Does It Convey America’s Asia Strategy

Under President Trump’s second administration, tariffs have functioned less as instruments of free trade and more as tools of leverage. China has been subjected to persistent punitive duties not because of trade deficits alone, but because it is viewed as a systemic rival. India’s experience has been different. While tariffs were raised sharply in 2025, they were also negotiable—and reversible. One can say that  China’s tariffs are structural and India’s have been conditional. While it may mark a fundamental difference in Washington’s strategic calculus but India's capacity to absorb these tariffs have been far too lower than the China.

Gains for India: Relative and Not Absolute 

The significance of the deal lies in how it alters relative competitiveness. Indian exporters are not suddenly the cheapest in the U.S. market. Bangladesh still dominates ultra-low-cost garments; Vietnam remains faster and smoother operationally. But India is now competitive where it matters most to U.S. firms: scale, diversification, compliance, and political reliability.

In sectors such as textiles, engineering goods, specialty chemicals, and gems and jewellery, tariff relief restores India’s ability to compete on price without demanding it compete on political risk. This is precisely the niche U.S. firms seek as they reduce exposure to China without over-concentrating in Vietnam.

Energy, Russia, and Strategic Signalling

Perhaps the most geopolitically revealing element of the deal is energy. While the Indian government has been careful in its public language, U.S. officials have framed the agreement as linked to India reducing purchases of Russian oil. Whether or not this is implemented fully, the signalling is clear: trade access is being aligned with geopolitical behaviour.

India has not accepted formal conditionality, but it has accepted strategic expectations. This is a new phase in U.S.–India economic relations—less transactional than with allies, but no longer purely autonomous. 

Further, sheer geopolitics of India's neighbourhood, and strategic psyche of China, and potential threats arising out of the same, warrant a much closer strategic partnership between India and Russia, irrespective of all other issues. I shall deal with this issue separately.       

The Limits of the Deal

The agreement does not resolve structural constraints within India: logistics costs, regulatory unpredictability, and non-tariff barriers continue to erode competitiveness. Nor does it settle sensitive issues such as agriculture or digital trade. Like many Trump-era deals, it is broad in ambition but thin in legal text.

Yet this incompleteness is itself revealing. The deal is less a treaty than a framework of trust, whose real value lies in what it enables next.

Conclusion:

The Trump–Modi trade deal marks India’s quiet graduation into a category Washington has struggled to define: a non-ally strategic partner embedded in U.S. supply-chain thinking. It does not end trade friction, nor does it lock in permanent preferences. But it signals that India is no longer competing merely on cost. It is competing on credibility—and that, in the current global order, is the scarcest commodity of all.

---

Strategic Recommendation: Treat the deal as a window, not a destination. The next 18–24 months are critical to lock India into U.S. supply chains irreversibly—before tariffs again become instruments of pressure.

---